Tensions between Iran and the United States remain high as negotiations over a potential agreement continue to face significant challenges. Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf has stated that Tehran will not approve any deal unless it fully protects the rights and interests of the Iranian people.
His comments came after reports suggested that US President Donald Trump had returned a revised and tougher proposal to Iran for consideration. While both sides continue exchanging draft terms and amendments, no final agreement has been reached so far.
The proposed agreement is considered important because it could formally end the ongoing Middle East conflict, ease regional tensions, and help reopen the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz, a key route for global oil shipments. However, differences over major issues continue to slow progress.
One of Washington’s primary goals is to ensure that Iran does not develop nuclear weapons. The United States has repeatedly insisted on strict guarantees regarding Iran’s nuclear activities. Iran, on the other hand, maintains that its nuclear programme is intended solely for peaceful and civilian purposes.
Ghalibaf emphasized that Iran remains cautious in dealing with Washington, stating that past experiences have created a deep trust deficit between the two countries. He stressed that any future agreement must include clear guarantees that protect Iranian national interests.
Iran has also reportedly demanded access to billions of dollars in frozen assets before moving toward more substantial negotiations. Meanwhile, discussions continue regarding regional security issues and maritime access through the Strait of Hormuz.
Although a temporary ceasefire has reduced large-scale military confrontations, occasional incidents and security concerns continue to affect the region. Analysts believe that any additional changes to the proposed agreement could delay a final settlement even further.
For now, both Tehran and Washington remain engaged in diplomatic discussions, but the path toward a comprehensive agreement remains uncertain as negotiators attempt to bridge deep political and security differences.
